Brave New World<\/em> by Aldous Huxley almost 40 years ago, I have been wary of the use of science and technology to create human beings: to make babies in test-tubes, to mass produce them.<\/p>\nAnd over the years, as we have moved closer to the horrifying vision of Huxley (expressed in the quote at the beginning of this newsflash), I have wondered what the real reason is for this seemingly inexorable slide toward an evident dystopia (the opposite of a utopia).<\/p>\n
And I think the answer goes back to the story of Faust.<\/p>\n
Faust or Faustus (Latin for “auspicious” or “lucky”) is the protagonist of a classic German legend who makes a pact with the Devil in exchange for knowledge.<\/p>\n
The Faust of the early Faust-books\u2014and of the ballads, dramas and puppet-plays which grew out of them\u2014is irrevocably damned because he prefers human to divine knowledge (“he laid the Holy Scriptures behind the door and under the bench, refused to be called doctor of Theology, but preferred to be styled doctor of Medicine”).<\/p>\n
Men desire to know, and there seem to be no limits to this desire. Men desire to be omniscient, to know everything there is to know.<\/p>\n
But to be a man is by definition to be limited, both in physical and in intellectual ways.<\/p>\n
Still, men seek to surpass these limits. In fact, in doing so, they seek to become God, or God-like \u2014 and they are often willing to make a pact with the Devil, it seems, to reach this goal.<\/p>\n
Those who wish to play God with human life, to build new human beings, better human beings, may not intend to do evil. They may wish to do only good things. They may wish for better human health \u2014 a better human race!<\/p>\n
But there is a problem here, a problem and a trap.<\/p>\n
The problem is that “science” is often just “ignorance” with a veneer \u2014 perhaps one step removed from complete ignorance, containing some new knowledge, yes, about DNA organization, for example, but still far short of a complete, and true, knowledge.<\/p>\n
We can see this when we look at the “science” of past centuries: it has never been definitive; it is a slow process of building up knowledge, with breakthroughs and setbacks, never completed.<\/p>\n
It is a process, not an end.<\/p>\n
But in our age, the admittedly dramatic successes of “science,” despite its limitations \u2014 in communications, in computing, in nanotechnology, in biochemistry, in nuclear energy, to mention just a few \u2014 have given “science” the veneer of divinity.<\/p>\n
This, many think, our modern science, our modern knowledge, is the “true hope of mankind.”<\/p>\n
This, they think, is what will provide us someday with healing, with health, with (some dare to think) immortality \u2014 and woe to anyone who would stand in the way of “knowledge” or “progress” or “research” toward this noble end!<\/p>\n
So this has become the secular religion of our age, lacking in humility… lacking in wisdom… disdainful or morality…<\/p>\n
And like other religions in more primitive times, many are willing to pay any price, make any sacrifice, to please this new “god,” this rapacious desire for “knowledge” at all costs \u2014 including human sacrifice…<\/p>\n
Obama came down from the meeting just after 5:14 p.m, got into his limousine with his wife and children, and drove out of the Vatican to catch a flight to Ghana, where he was expected at a state dinner this evening. He had been in the Vatican for a little more than one hour.<\/p>\n
How the meeting went<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\nFather Lombardi, speaking in the press office at about 6 p.m., said the meeting and the atmosphere were \u201cvery cordial and serene.\u201d<\/p>\n
He said \u201cthe president clearly has charisma and this was noted by the people around the Pope, from the prefecture (of the papal household) as well as the Gentlemen of His Holiness. He has a great capacity for treating people well.\u201d<\/p>\n
Fr. Lombardi said the Pope told him afterwards he was \u201cextremely satisfied, content and serene\u201d with how the talks went between the two.<\/p>\n
The Pope noted that the president spoke of his commitment to reduce the number of abortions and noted his attention to the position of the Church and her position on moral issues, Lombardi said.<\/p>\n
The Pope said Obama was an attentive interlocutor and a willing listener, Lombardi said.<\/p>\n
In the area of international politics, Lombardi referred to the Middle East situation, saying, \u201chere there is a convergence of views,\u201d especially with regard to the fact there must be two independent States (Palestine and Israel), that settlements be stopped, and that all sides \u2013 Israel, Arab states and Palestine \u2013 be disposed to talk and to stop violence and agree to peace.<\/p>\n
He said both men highlighted the role of education in the commitment to peace, especially in order to create a new mentality of peace. The Pope spoke of the role of the Church in education and President Obama recalled his early education in a Catholic school, Lombardi said.<\/p>\n
Father Lombardi stressed the importance of the meeting between two leaders, one \u2013 the Pope \u2013 a moral leader, saying that when two people meet personally and get to know each other, this is always a great step forward.<\/p>\n
He said Pope Benedict and President Obama spoke English to each other, although two other people were present \u2013 Msgr. Peter Wells of the Secretariat of State and an interpreter from the Obama delegation.<\/p>\n
When asked about the Pope\u2019s gift to Obama of Dignitas<\/em> Personae<\/em>, Fr. Lombardi said \u201cthis was not foreseen, but its meaning is clear.\u201d<\/p>\nRepeating himself, Lombardi said the Pope did not wish to stress differences, but rather to place topics and viewpoints on the table with \u201cclarity and objectivity.\u201d<\/p>\n
He again defined the meeting as cordial, serene and very productive.<\/p>\n
Hints of what happened<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\nThe reporters on the scene today said this is what they saw:<\/p>\n
When the president and Pope met, Benedict said, \u201cMr. President, welcome,\u201d and Obama responded: \u201cThank you so much. It is a great honor for me. Thank you.\u201d<\/p>\n
As they were both seated at the Pope\u2019s desk, surrounded for a few minutes by TV, photographers and journalists Obama said to the Pope: \u201cYou must be very used to having your photo taken… I am still getting used to it.\u201d<\/p>\n
While the pictures were still being taken, Benedict XVI asked the president about the just-concluded G8 summit in L\u2019Aquila. “You must be tired after all these discussions,” Benedict said.<\/p>\n
The president responded that the meetings marked “great progress” and “something concrete,” although the precise topic they were discussing at that point was unclear.<\/p>\n
Then, the President and Obama went into a separate room, and the reporters could not hear or see any more of the conversation.<\/p>\n
The pool of three reporters waited in a small adjoining closet while the Pope and president spoke privately.<\/p>\n
At a certain moment, Monsignor Georg Gaenswein, the Pope\u2019s private secretary, opened the door and handed them three copies of a little green book.<\/p>\n
He said to them, they reported: \u201cTogether with the autographed copy of the encyclical, there will be another gift for the president, a copy of Dignitas personae. Reading it might help the president understand the position and teaching of the Church on these issues.\u201d<\/p>\n
The reporters were then allowed to see the very end of the Pope’s meeting with the president.<\/p>\n
They said that when Pope Benedict gave Obama the encyclical, and then the little green booklet Dignitas<\/em> personae<\/em>, he said, \u201cThis is a document about bioethics,\u201d and the president replied, \u201cOh, what we discussed earlier. I\u2019ll have some reading to do on the plane.\u201d<\/p>\nPresident Obama’s entourage also included Gen. James Jones, national security adviser; Mona Sutphen, White House deputy chief of staff; Denis McDonough, deputy national security adviser for strategic communications; Robert Gibbs, White House press secretary; and David Axelrod, senior adviser to the president.<\/p>\n
Pope Benedict gave Obama a mosaic showing St. Peter’s Basilica and Square, an autographed copy of the encyclical Caritas in Veritate<\/em> (“Charity in Truth”) and a medal marking the fifth year of his pontificate.<\/p>\nThe president told the Pope the mosaic, which was made in the Vatican’s mosaic studio, “was very beautiful” and would have “a place of honor” in the White House.<\/p>\n
The president gave the Pope a liturgical stole that had been on the remains of St. John Neumann, the first U.S. male citizen to be proclaimed a saint.<\/p>\n
Then Pope Benedict told the president: “A blessing on all your work and also for you.”<\/p>\n
The president responded, “Thank you very much. We look forward to a very strong relationship… It was very productive, especially today.”<\/p>\n
A Benedict-Obama Alliance?<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\nMany observes are perplexed by the way the Vatican seemingly has embraced a US president (Obama) who is evidently very strongly committed to the idea of legalized abortion and homosexual marriage.<\/p>\n
Some pro-life Catholics have told me they are scandalized that the Pope has even agreed to meet with Obama.<\/p>\n
But there is no doubt that the Pope has attempted to engage Obama in a conversation, a dialogue.<\/p>\n
First, the Pope spoke with Obama right after he was elected last November.<\/p>\n
“I’ve had a wonderful conversation with the Pope over the phone right after the election,” Obama told a group of Catholic journalists in Washington before he left for Europe. “And in some ways we see this as a meeting with any other government — the government of the Holy See. There are going to be some areas where we’ve got deep agreements; there are going to be some areas where we’ve got some disagreements.”<\/p>\n
L’Osservatore Romano<\/em>, the Vatican’s daily newspaper, gave Obama a positive review after his first 100 days in office. In a front-page editorial, it said that even on ethical questions Obama hadn’t confirmed the “radical” direction he discussed during the campaign.<\/p>\nTensions grew when Obama was invited to receive an honorary degree at the leading U.S. Catholic university, Notre Dame. Dozens of U.S. bishops denounced the university and the local bishop boycotted the ceremony.<\/p>\n
Former St. Louis Archbishop Raymond Burke, who now heads a Vatican tribunal, accused Obama of pursuing anti-life and antifamily agendas. He called it a “scandal” that Notre Dame had invited him to speak.<\/p>\n
Yet L’Osservatore<\/em> concluded that Obama was looking for some common ground with his speech, noting he asked Americans to work together to reduce the number of abortions.<\/p>\nSome American Catholics then criticized the Vatican newspaper for its accommodating stance.<\/p>\n
This week, Cardinal Justin Rigali, who heads the U.S. bishops’ Committee on Pro-Life Activities, complained that the final guidelines of the National Institutes of Health for human embryonic stem cell research are broader than the draft guidelines.<\/p>\n
As a child in Indonesia, Obama’s Muslim father enrolled him in Catholic school for a few years. Obama is a Protestant.<\/p>\n
Patrick Whelan, president of Catholic Democrats, told Catholic News Service<\/em> in Rome today that with Obama’s visit and the nomination of Miguel Diaz, a theologian, as ambassador to the Holy See, “I think there is a new era about to be launched — a positive, productive one.”<\/p>\n“I think people at the Vatican realize he has some grounding in Catholic social teaching” and that he is able to mobilize and motivate young people for good, Whelan said.<\/p>\n
On the issue of abortion, “Obama has taken a third way — the whole abortion-reduction strategy is not just window dressing,” he said. “I think they (Obama administration officials) are very committed to doing something to reduce abortions without resorting to criminalization.”<\/p>\n
Whelan said studies have shown that poverty has a huge impact on abortion rates and “I think the best thing for the unborn was Obama’s economic stimulus package.”<\/p>\n
McDonough said Obama had been influenced by Catholic social teaching and by Catholic social service programs, particularly when he worked with Catholic-funded programs as a community organizer in Chicago.<\/p>\n
In the early July issue of the Italian Catholic magazine 30 Giorni<\/em>, Cardinal Georges Cottier, the former theologian of the papal household, said the criticism from the U.S. bishops over Obama’s support of legal abortion was justified.<\/p>\nBut, he said, Obama’s expressed commitment to reducing the number of abortions and guaranteeing conscientious objection rights for health workers shows that “his words go in the direction of diminishing the evil.”<\/p>\n
After the meeting was over, but before Father Lombardi’s press briefing, I went over to a little cafe below the building where Cardinal Ratzinger used to live before he became Pope.<\/p>\n
There I ran into Cardinal John Foley of Philadelphia, who used to be the head of the Vatican’s Social Communications office. We sat down together for a brief chat.<\/p>\n
“Have you heard anything about the meeting with the president?” I asked.<\/p>\n
“Yes,” he said. “I’ve heard it went very well. Very serene. The Pope was very frank… There was a very good spirit.”<\/p>\n
“How was the Pope frank?” I asked.<\/p>\n
“He explained the Church’s position on pro-life and biotechnology issues to the president,” Foley said. “I think President Obama has to have been impressed by this Pope. He is a kind, learned, gentle, very deeply spiritual man…”<\/p>\n
“But does this have political implications?” I asked. “Does it mean the Church is tilting toward the Democratic Party?”<\/p>\n
“No, not at all,” Foley said, shaking his head. “No, you should look at what Cardinal George of Chicago just said at the meeting of the US bishops in Dallas in 2004. He said the Democratic Party, which used to be so close to ordinary Catholics and in harmony with so many Catholic principles, has lost its soul with some of its positions today.”<\/p>\n
“And the Republican Party…?”<\/p>\n
“Well,” Foley said, smiling a little, “what Cardinal George said was, ‘Of course, the Republican Party never had a soul.'”<\/p>\n
Final reflection<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\nEvidently, Benedict feels he can appeal to Obama to reconsider his position on abortion and homosexual marriage.<\/p>\n
Most serious pro-life Catholics in America would believe that this is naive \u2014 that it is silly to think that Obama will make even a slight change in his position in favor of legalized abortion and embryonic stem cell research.<\/p>\n
Nevertheless, it appears that the Pope made the argument to Obama today that all of the president’s social policies will ultimately fail and leave no enduring good fruit unless he takes up a position in defense of human dignity \u2014 of the dignity of the human person \u2014 in all cases, at all times, from the beginning to the end of life.<\/p>\n
And, as astonishing as it seems, Obama has apparently agreed to at least study the arguments of the Church on this point.<\/p>\n
That is the meaning of the words: “Oh, what we discussed earlier. I’ll have some reading to do on the plane.”<\/p>\n
Of course, we do not know whether Obama actually read the book while on the plane tonight…<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
St. Anthony on the Judgments of God<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n“When Abba Anthony thought about the depth of the judgments of God, he asked, ‘Lord, how is it that some die when they are young, while others drag on to extreme old age? Why are there those who are poor and those who are rich? Why do wicked men prosper and why are the just in need?’ He heard a voice answering him, ‘Anthony, keep your attention on yourself; these things are according to the judgment of God, and it is not to your advantage to know anything about them.'” \u2014St. Anthony of Egypt<\/strong><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Little Green Book The Pope gave a little book to US President Barack Obama after their meeting today in the Vatican. \u201cThis is a document about bioethics,\u201d the Pope said. And the president replied, \u201cOh, what we discussed earlier. I\u2019ll have some reading to do on the plane”… By Robert Moynihan, reporting from Rome\u00a0 “Alpha […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":345,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[67],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37384","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-newsflash"],"yoast_head":"\n
Letter from Rome, #18, 2009 - Inside The Vatican<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n