{"id":62441,"date":"2024-03-04T18:44:18","date_gmt":"2024-03-04T23:44:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/insidethevatican.com\/?p=62441"},"modified":"2024-03-05T10:18:00","modified_gmt":"2024-03-05T15:18:00","slug":"letter-6-2024-monday-march-4-melloni-on-conclaves","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/insidethevatican.com\/news\/newsflash\/letter-6-2024-monday-march-4-melloni-on-conclaves\/","title":{"rendered":"Letter #6, 2024, Monday, March 4: Melloni on conclaves"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Italian historian <\/em>Alberto Melloni.<\/em><\/strong> He has written a book on the history of papal conclaves (<\/em>link<\/em><\/strong><\/a>)<\/em>. Now he is calling on <\/em>Pope Francis<\/em><\/strong> to change the rules of the next papal conclave… in order to avoid a possible division among the cardinals, and a division in the Church after the conclave… Melloni teaches History of Christianity at the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, and heads the John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences in Bologna, Italy<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>A leading Italian historian of papal conclaves fears that the current rules of papal conclaves leave the Church open to a possible catastrophe.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>For this reason, Melloni is urging Pope Francis<\/strong> to make reforms to the voting procedure designed to move much more slowly, lengthening the conclave process in order to “vet” potential candidates before electing them only to find there is some “skeleton” in the new Pope’s closet.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>“Here is a scenario from an imagin\u00adary future conclave,” Melloni wrote in The Tablet<\/em> almost three years ago (link<\/strong><\/a>). “White smoke from the chimney above the Sistine Chapel; the cardinal protodeacon appears on the balcony of St Peter\u2019s to declare Habemus papam <\/em>[“We have a Pope”]; the purple mozzettas crowd around the side windows; the newly elected pope steps out. And as he smiles and humbly introduces himself to the crowds in the square, a lone social media post makes a stunning allegation. Within seconds, the story is across the internet: the elected cardinal, when he was bishop, had received a hypothetically credible complaint of an abuse committed by a priest and had waited, or waited too long, before acting. The accused priest had gone on to commit further crimes. In the square and in the press boxes, eyes drop from the balcony to their smartphones. Enthusiasm gives way to embarrassed silence. The pope steps back inside, and resigns. The see is again vacant.“<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>So, it seems, Melloni is concerned about the “global reach” of our “information culture” \u2014 and those who own or control the means of that culture — which registers a huge number of events and actions, text messages and emails, in a way that was unthinkable just a few years ago.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>And because Melloni thinks a Pope might be elected with insufficient knowledge about all of the decisions he has made in his life, only to have those decisions made public moments after his election, he is calling on Pope Francis<\/strong> to “slow down” the process of electing Popes.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Rather than have four votes each day, he is proposing one vote only per day.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>And then, rather than having a vote every day, he is proposing (possibly) voting… only once every other day…<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Thus, for example, a conclave with a failed vote on the 1st day followed by an election on the 4th ballot of the second day \u2014 as occurred in 2005 when Pope Benedict was elected \u2014 could take, under Melloni’s proposal, not two days, but 10 full days(!)…<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>So the main thrust of Melloni’s argument is to slow down the conclave<\/em>, and, evidently, check even more carefully than ever before to see if there is anything in the past of a newly-elected Pope which might cause scandal and confusion in the world and in the Church.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>The suggestion seems to be that the cardinals would be informed if there might be such an accusation<\/em> against the newly-elected Pope to ensure that the college would remain steadfast and united even if such an accusation were suddenly made<\/em>.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Here below is an article about Melloni’s proposal from Crux<\/strong><\/a>, and the article by Melloni himself, published in Italian on February 26 in Il Mulino<\/em> in Italy, in our own, sometimes imperfect, English translation. \u2014RM<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>The February 29 article from Crux<\/em><\/strong><\/a>:<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>By\u00a0Crux Staff<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Feb 29, 2024<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>ROME \u2013 A prominent progressive supporter of Pope Francis<\/strong> has suggested changes to the rules governing conclaves to slow down the election of the next pope, in order to guard against the possibility that well-timed leaks or other forms of interference, perhaps related to charges of sexual abuse, might influence the outcome.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Specifically, veteran Italian Church historian Alberto Melloni<\/strong> has proposed that there be only one ballot each day the cardinals are gathered in the Sistine Chapel to select a new pope, followed by a day of pause for conversation and reflection.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Melloni also called for the eventual acceptance of the election result to be slowed down as well, giving a candidate who receives more than two-thirds of the vote, and thus who\u2019s elected as pope, a full night to consider and to consult before making a final decision.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Under such a system, Melloni noted, the conclave of 2005, which required just four ballots and roughly 24 hours to elect Pope Benedict XVI, would have lasted ten full days instead.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Melloni is best-known as a key figure in the \u201cBologna school\u201d associated with the late historian Giuseppe Alberigo<\/strong>, which produced a multi-volume history of Vatican II (1962-65) that popularized a progressive reading of the council.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>His essay on the conclave appeared Feb. 26 as part of the online edition of\u00a0Il Mulino<\/em>\u00a0(\u201cThe Mill\u201d), a popular Italian journal of culture and politics.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>In effect, Melloni argues that current events, including the Russian war in Ukraine and the Israeli\/Hamas conflict in Gaza, offer reminders that there are forces on the world stage seeking some form of either regional or global hegemony \u2013 and that the Catholic Church, as he puts it, is a \u201cnatural antagonist and objective obstacle\u201d to such ambitions.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>For all its faults, Melloni argues, the Catholic Church is a uniquely unarmed but nevertheless powerful global institution, which various states and non-state actors might wish to influence or subvert.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>In that context, Melloni says, the clerical sexual abuse scandals have created \u201ca button with which anyone can ostracize anyone else, leaving it to history to sort out justified accusations from the unjustified, and to God to compensate the innocent and punish the guilty.\u201d<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>For that reason, Melloni suggests, the next conclave \u201cwill have to protect the elected person from the risk of being delegitimized by an accusation designed to divide cardinals who challenge the election of an unworthy person from those who instead consider the election valid, at least for the presumption of innocence.\u201d<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Historically, Melloni argues, the function of a conclave has not been to ensure that the holiest or most qualified person is elected pope, but simply to guarantee that the outcome would be considered legitimate and the authority of the new pope accepted.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>In an age of artificial intelligence, social media and mass computing power, Melloni writes, that function faces new threats related to the capacity to circulate damaging accusations against public figures on a mass scale and in real time.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Doing so with regard to the abuse scandals, Melloni says, is merely a question of \u201cwill and means,\u201d both of which \u201ccan arise within states, or in those large companies that act like superpowers of computing and which can place their megalomaniac servility at the service of occult powers, as we\u2019ve already seen in various public affairs.\u201d<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>To remain compactly behind the newly elected pope even in the teeth of such an attack, Melloni writes, will require a compact and united College of Cardinals truly certain of its choice, for which more time may be required.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Lengthening the conclave, he argues, \u201cwould guarantee time for conversation and discussion within the college, which is more necessary than ever to reach a more shared electoral process and to allow candidates time to withdraw, in the well-founded expectation that someone could use true or even plausible information against them.\u201d<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>A slower process, Melloni says, would also counteract \u201cthe media tendency to paint a conclave with the colors of an American primary, made up of tricks, money and ideological maneuvers.\u201d<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Moreover, Melloni also says that the custom of holding two ballots back-to-back inside the conclave was designed to replace the older custom of \u201caccession,\u201d in which a cardinal could change his vote after a ballot in which no one received a two-thirds majority. The system was cumbersome and also compromised the secrecy of the first vote, since ballots had to be checked to ensure that a cardinal wasn\u2019t voting for the same candidate twice. The option was suppressed in 1903.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>As to whether Pope Francis might adopt such a reform, Melloni says \u201cprobably yes,\u201d despite voicing concern that the advisors on Church law to whom the pontiff might entrust such a project lack both the \u201cecclesiological talent\u201d and \u201clegal virtuosity\u201d of earlier generations of canonists.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Nonetheless, Melloni argues, a reform is necessary to avoid the risk that \u201cwarring nations and the great players in the media market\u201d might subvert the conclave, provoking a \u201cfatal impasse in the unity of the Church.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>The February 29 article from Il Mulino<\/em><\/strong><\/a>:<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>A reform of the conclave, albeit small, which does not alter its composition, functions, majorities, but extends its time would be very necessary.\u00a0For multiple reasons<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>“The extraordinarily short duration of the two conclaves of 2005 and 2013 says that a college of cardinals without internal connections has a tendency to surrender quite quickly to the candidate who rises most rapidly.”<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>by\u00a0Alberto Melloni<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>February 26, 2024<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>In December 2023, two pieces of news were launched from one of the American sites dedicated to the denigration of Pope Francis<\/strong>.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>The first was that the pontiff had asked that work to carry out a reform of the conclave process begin. Rather than news, it was non-news, since the maintenance of the institution of the conclave over the centuries has been normal, and over the last two centuries almost constant \u2014 a guarantee that no one could challenge the election by complaining about the obsolescence of the rules.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>The second piece of “news” was that the Pope was considering including in the conclave (as he did in the synod of bishops) other non-cardinal figures to increase the “representativeness” of the electoral body: an innovation that would mean the abandonment of the Gregorian rule which since 1049 has reserved the election of the bishop of Rome to those clergy of Rome who were cardinals, thus transforming the choice of Peter’s successor into the casting for a Father General or the CEO of a Catholic multinational corporation — roles which do not exist.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Nothing has come of these rumored reforms between then and now.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>The tidal wave caused by\u00a0Fiducia supplicans<\/em><\/a>\u00a0— the instruction of the Doctrine of the Faith on the blessing of “irregular” couples which will go down in the annals as useless (those who did it will continue, those who are hostile will deny it), ineffective (if the objective was to silence the debate in the German Synod this was missed), counterproductive (the description of love between people of the same sex provided in that act is more acrimonious and unfair than that of the Catechism) and vulgar (the recommendation to contain it in 15 seconds which is a sixth of that dedicated to (the blessing of) a stable) \u2013 suggests that, even if the ecclesiological superficiality of some of the pope’s advisors had entertained the idea (of changing the conclave rules), it is not in these months of 2024 that the conclave will be able to be replaced with another institution.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Yet — it is an opinion that I have already expressed in\u00a0The Tablet<\/em><\/a>\u00a0and on the\u00a0print edition of this magazine<\/a>\u00a0— a reform of the conclave that alters not its composition, functions, majorities, but its timing would be very necessary for reasons that are evident to money, not only to the most attentive observers.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>The return (today) of the wars waged, directly or by proxy, by the superpowers of the 20th century \u2013 the Russian invasion of Ukraine after eight years of war, the Hamas pogrom in Israel, followed by an operation conducted by the Israeli Defense Forces with a frightening number of civilian victims that Hamas transforms into recruitment propaganda \u2013 has reminded everyone of an often forgotten trait of Roman Catholicism.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>And that is that, in a world in which ambitions for hegemony on both a regional and global scale are becoming increasingly evident, the Roman Catholic Church, more and more massively than other Churches or communities of faith, constitutes a natural antagonist and an objective obstacle to neo-imperialist sovereignism.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>In the face of power policies based on atomic and technological deterrence, the Church of Rome represents a reality that is disarmed but global by nature, with a grip that, although reduced by the processes of secularization and not yet adapted to post-secular society, remains incomparable in quantitative and qualitative terms compared to other universes, such as the Sunni one, in which terrorist impulses have taken root which require very long eradication times and theological elaborations of cohesion which are still just embryonic today.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>In the long struggle between modernity and the papacy understood as the summit of a lost Christianity, the Roman Catholic institutions had developed their own culture of the enemy, made up of condemnations, anathemas, excommunications, social and dogmatic doctrines that have long made sterile and supplanted the powerful and simple announcement of the Gospel.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>But once that era was over — due to the consumption of modernity as an expansive ideology and reform of the papacy thanks to the Second Vatican Council and its reception — the Church of Rome did not dedicate much attention to building the systems to defend, no longer its own temporal power or to affirm the nostalgia of an imaginary Christianitas <\/em>[“Christendom”], but to defend its own institutional physiognomy.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Even if what emerges from the 20th century is not the “servant and poor” Church dreamed of by Marie-Dominique Chenu<\/strong>, it has certainly abandoned the moral haughtiness of Catholic triumphalism — which was not the brake, but the incubator of the most reckless financial associations and of the most devastating silence towards the rate of\u00a0rape of minors of which Catholic clerics have been guilty<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Yet, precisely the ecclesiastical legislation on what with a revealing euphemism is called “pedophilia” has created not a complex weapon, but a button with which anyone — the victims of unpunished violence, ecclesiastical authorities in ruthless competition, the most classic enemies of the Church \u2013 can obtain the ostracism of anyone, leaving to (the passage of) time the task of decanting well-founded or unfounded accusations, and to God to compensate the innocent and sanction the unpunished.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>This is why a reform of the conclave is increasingly urgent and necessary: \u200b\u200bin fact, it does not take much imagination to understand that the college of cardinals will have to protect the elected person from the risk that he will be delegitimized by an accusation constructed to divide the cardinals between those who will challenge the election of an unworthy person from those who will instead consider the election valid, at least due to the presumption of innocence.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>The conclave, in fact, in its historical journey, has an objective, which is not to elect the holiest, nor the most learned, nor even the most prudent (as required by the old monastic rule which recommended, concerning the choice of an abbot, that “si doctus doceat,<\/em> si pius oret, si prudens regat<\/em>\u201d [“if he is learned, let him teach; if pious, let him pray; if prudent, let him rule”].<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>First the Gregorian reformers of the 11th century narrowed the base of electors to the cardinals, then the civil authorities forced them to remain in the city where they were elected from the middle of the 13th century — for the sole purpose of guaranteeing an uncontested and indisputable succession: despite the\u00a0shortcomings\u00a0<\/em>of the beginnings and the disaster of the Western schism [from 1378 to 1417, when there were first two, then three popes at once], the institution of the conclave, therefore, continues to function precisely for this reason.<\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>The same purpose is served by the custom which — after the incisive reforms of 1215, 1620 and 1903 — causes many popes to update the norms of the conclaves with the provisions and purposes I mentioned earlier.\u00a0For the most part these are detailed adjustments to the calculation of the majority, but in addition to them there are also more relevant decisions such as the one which establishes that, regardless of the place in which the pope dies or resigns, the seat of the conclave remains the Sistine Chapel with the\u00a0Last Judgment<\/em>\u00a0as the backdrop to the television footage preceding the\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Letter #6, 2024, Monday, March 4: Melloni on conclaves<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Pope supporter argues for a slower conclave to face risk of smear campaigns (<\/strong>link<\/strong><\/a>)<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>MAKE THE CONCLAVE SLOWER (<\/strong>link<\/strong><\/a>)<\/strong><\/h3>\n