Bishop Bernard Fellay, SSPX head, says Vatican sent “mixed messages” during reconciliation talks


Bishop Fellay is pictured near an image of St. Pius X at the society’s headquarters in Menzingen, Switzerland, last year (CNS photo)

The head of the traditionalist Society of St. Pius X said he has been receiving mixed messages from the Vatican for years over whether and how the group might be brought back into full communion with the Church.

Bishop Bernard Fellay, superior general of the Society, claimed that top Vatican officials told him not to be discouraged by official statements from the Vatican, because they did not reflect Pope Benedict XVI’s true feelings.

According to an audio recording posted on YouTube December 30 (see below), the bishop gave a nearly two-hour talk December 28 at Our Lady of Mount Carmel Academy in New Hamburg, Ontario, Canada. He spoke about the Society’s three years of discussions with the Vatican over the Society’s future and explained how he interpreted behind-the-scenes communications about the talks.

Apparently speaking without a text, he also called the Jewish people “enemies of the Church,” saying Jewish leaders’ support of the Second Vatican Council “shows that Vatican II is their thing, not the Church’s.”

Those most opposed to the Church granting canonical recognition to the traditionalist society have been “the enemies of the Church: the Jews, the Masons,” he said.

Pope Benedict launched a series of doctrinal discussions with the SSPX in 2009, lifting excommunications imposed on its four bishops, who were ordained in 1988 without papal approval, and expressing his hopes they would return to full communion with the Church.

In 2011, the Vatican gave SSPX leaders a “doctrinal preamble” to sign that outlines principles and criteria necessary to guarantee fidelity to the Church and its teaching; the Vatican said the SSPX leaders would have to sign it to move toward full reconciliation.

But Bishop Fellay said he repeatedly told the Vatican that the contents of the preamble — particularly acceptance of the modern Mass and the Council as expressed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church — were unacceptable. He said the only reason he continued discussions with Vatican officials was because others “very close to the Pope” had assured him that the Pope was not in agreement with hard-line official pronouncements from the Vatican. According to Fellay, retired Colombian Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos, then-president of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, the office responsible for relations with traditionalist Catholics, had told him in March 2009 that the society would be formally recognized.

When the bishop asked how that could be possible when recognition hinged on accepting the teachings of Vatican II, he said the cardinal replied that such a requirement was only “political” and “administrative” and that, “by the way, that is not what the Pope thinks.” Fellay said he continued to get similar messages from other Vatican officials, even as the formal talks continued. The verbal and written messages were very credible, he said, because they came from officials who saw the Pope “every day or every two days.” He said he wouldn’t give names, but he did claim “the secretary of the Pope himself” was among those who told him not to worry too much about hard-line Vatican positions. Even if the doctrinal congregation ruled against the Society, he claimed the secretary told him, the Pope “will overrule it in favor of the society.”

“So, you see, I got all of these kinds of messages which were not fitting together,” Fellay said. “I got an official thing where I clearly have to say ‘no’ and I got other messages — which are not official, of course —but which say, ‘No, that’s not what the Pope wants.’” The unofficial assurances were what kept him engaged in talks, he said, since the Vatican’s official demands, which carried the Pope’s approval, “would mean the end of our relation with Rome.”

Bishop Fellay said Pope Benedict wrote to him, emphasizing that full recognition required that the society accept the magisterium as the judge of what is tradition, accept the Council as an integral part of tradition and accept that the modern Mass is valid and licit.

Bishop Fellay said, “Even in the Council there are some things we accept” as well as reject; however, the group wishes to be free to say, “There are errors in the Council” and that “the new Mass is evil.”

Reacting to Fellay’s comments, the Pope’s spokesman, Father Federico Lombardi, said the Church remains committed to deepening its relations with Jews and finds it “absolutely unacceptable” to consider the Jewish people as enemies.

“It is absolutely unacceptable, impossible, to define the Jews as enemies of the Church,” Lombardi said.

“The word ‘enemies’ used here by Bishop Fellay is of course a religious concept and refers to any group or religious sect which opposes the mission of the Catholic Church and her efforts to fulfill it: the salvation of souls,” the Society’s US branch said in a press release on its website January 5. It said “this religious context” is based on Jesus telling the Pharisees in the Gospel of St. Matthew: “Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters.”

“By referring to the Jews, Bishop Fellay’s comment was aimed at the leaders of Jewish organizations, and not the Jewish people,” the statement said, adding that any accusations of the Society being anti-Semitic were false and an example of “hate speech made in an attempt to silence its message.”


Facebook Comments