Immacolata Solaro Del Borgo, now age 93, in a photo from six years ago. She is an Italian noblewoman who has in her family archives precious relics of saints, including of St. John Chrysostom and St. John the Evangelist. She has spent her life trying to build trust between the East and the West, by bringing gifts of relics to the East…
“Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God.” —Jesus Christ, in his Sermon on the Mount, reported in the Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 5, verse 9
“In a time of ferocious de-Christianization, Catholics, Orthodox and Protestants ought to unite against the atheistic thought which has been increasingly bold and now seems in many places to dominate our culture.” —Italian Marquise Immacolata Solaro Del Borgo, 93, in a 2007 article, after she traveled to Kazan, Russia, bearing gifts. She has spent a lifetime building bridges between the West and the East, bringing relics held by her ancient noble family to give to the Russian and Ukrainian people, in sign of the love that unites all followers of Christ (link)
“On May 13, 2007, though nearly 80 and suffering from soreness in her feet, she traveled to Kazan, capital of Tatarstan, bringing with her six precious relics of saints and a tiny fragment of clothing which once belonged to Mary, the mother of Jesus. The relics, belonging to St. Basil the Great, St. Blaise, St. Nicholas, St. Daria, St. Natalia and St. Pancratius, were collected in a single reliquary, fashioned by a Neapolitan jeweler in the 1600s, with a small silver box in the center where the fragment of Mary‘s clothing was preserved. ‘I bring these relics as my gift to you, and to the people of Russia, as a sign of my respect and love for Russia and all her people,’ Immacolata said to the Russian Orthodox bishop of Kazan, Anastasi, as she handed over the gift. ‘I hope the relics can enrich the new Marian sanctuary you are building around the icon of Our Lady of Kazan.’” —Italian journalist Serena Sartini, in a 2007 report on a journey to post-Soviet and pre-Ukraine war Russia made by the Italian noblewoman, Immacolata Solaro Del Borgo. I accompanied Immacolata on that occasion, when Russian television broadcast a report of her gift, given after walking barefoot for some distance, because he feet were inflamed and sore and she could not wear shoes…
“The American people urgently need to know the true history of the war in Ukraine and its current prospects.” —Prof. Jeffrey Sachs, in an article published today on 30-year history leading up to the Russia-Ukraine war (complete text published below)
Letter #113, 2023, Monday, July 17: Sachs on Ukraine
Why talk about Ukraine?
Because it is a terrible, brutal, bloody, tragic war that risks becoming wider and bloodier still.
Because the war, which never should have started, should be ended as soon as possible.
***
Zuppi in Washington
Today, Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, 67, the archbishop of Bologna in central Italy and the head of Italy’s bishops’ conference — so, an important figure in the Church in Italy (some even whisper that he might conceivably be good candidate to become the next Pope) — and the special emissary of Pope Francis to seek a “path to peace” in Ukraine, landed in the United States, to spend two days in Washington talking with government officials about aspects of the war in Ukraine. (see longer report below)
So, the “Pope’s point man” on the war is today in Washington for “peace talks”… (stay tuned)
***
Turmoil in Russia?
The war in Ukraine has gone on for more than 500 days, since it erupted on February 22, 2022. Almost a year and a half now…
Most of us cannot claim to “know” much about this war.
As so many say, “truth is the first casualty of war,” and governments wage war via deception: seeming weak when they are strong, and pretending to be strong when they are weak.
So do we know how many men have died in this war? No.
But there are many websites which seem to show real videos of the conflict, on such platforms as Telegram, and many analysts who say there may be as many as 300,000 Ukrainian soldiers killed thus far, and perhaps nearly as many Russian soldiers.
A slaughter, on both sides…
If true, this would mean that every single day, on average, since this war began, 500 men and boys on the Ukrainian side have been killed.
And an equal or higher number have been wounded.
This is a sorrow beyond telling — all the broken hearts and hopes, shattered families, broken dreams, fatherless children — killing fields…
Note: Here is a rather interesting July 14 report, three days ago, by the un-named analyst “Simplicius,” on the present inner workings of Russia’s military, containing many further links to statements and videos from the war zone… worth reading. Regarding reports that Putin may be about to dismiss Russia’s top general, Sergei Shoigu (link), he writes: “All I know is that, contrary to all the hate he gets from the uneducated blogosphere and armchair commandos, Shoigu for his part has been tirelessly visiting every Russian arms concern imaginable, pushing them to new heights of productivity.” In other words, Shoigu seems still to be firmly in the saddle, still enjoying Putin’s trust…
***
Jeffrey Sachs: The Eye-Witness
By a strange fate — or may we believe it may in fact have been providence? — I attended college at the same time and place as Jeffrey Sachs, in the 1970s, and we even had breakfast together on occasion.
Almost 50 years have passed by.
Jeffrey went on to a career as an academic, studying global economic and policy issues, finally becoming one of the world’s leading “globalists.”
(I have been criticized by readers for associating a “localist” like myself with a “globalist,” but this is simply a part of my life which was given to me, not something I chose…)
Sachs sees his work as to be an advocate for a more just, humane and balanced “global order.”
On many issues, he has room to develop and perhaps even revise his thought — and this means that he has not yet arrived at a final position on matters of importance, where the church’s teaching is a profound aid toward seeing what is the true good of human beings.
Both of us spent much time in that enigmatic country we call… Russia.
And both of us had hopes for a peaceful transition of the Soviet Union after 1991, hopes which have, since the start of this war, turned into ruined dreams, stained with the blood of hundreds of thousands.
Last month in the Vatican, for the first time after the 1970s, we met again, at the Pontifical Academy for Sciences, and spoke, both of old days, and of the present threats to world peace.
We “re-connected.”
And we agreed to keep in touch, and — perhaps — to do some podcasts together, in the interest both of peace, and of truth.
That is why, when I received in my email Sachs’ most recent piece on the Ukraine war, which places considerable blame on 30 years of apparent policy mistakes by the United States of America, I felt I should forward his thoughts and arguments to you, my readers.
Is what Sachs writes Gospel?
Of course not; not at all.
But Sachs is more than just an academic observer.
He has been an “insider.”
He was in Russia after the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991.
He actually met and worked with Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin, for many months.
In the timeline below, when it refers to 1991 and 1992, Sachs was there; he saw what happened with his own eyes.
He was an eye-witness.
And therefore, Sachs is a man with more credibility, more “first-hand experience” of Russia, than many members of the “chattering classes” heard in the media and on the internet today.
I believe Sachs is that rare person: intelligent, honest, and brave.
For Sachs to say what he is saying — that is, for him to attribute considerable blame for this war to the policy makers of the United States, something that runs directly counter to the dominant narrative — takes great bravery, it is “speaking truth to power.”
I appreciate what Sachs is saying, and have learned from it.
His words deserve to be read, just as the words of Archbishop Viganò deserve to be read.
So here they are…
I am doing this because it is simply my job — following instructions given to me years ago by Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict XVI, and, more recently, by Pope Francis himself.
My job is to report things that are true, without fear or favor, in the interest of truth, and of peace on earth.
It is time… —RM
***
P.S. Starting in 1999, I traveled almost every year to Russia.
In 2007, I accompanied a formidable Italian noblewoman named Immacolata Solaro Del Borgo (link and link), then 77, now 93, and still today of sound mind.
I helped her to walk through airports and board planes, as her feet were inflamed and she often could not wear shoes.
A few days ago, just in the days I was meeting with Jeffrey Sachs, I went again to meet with Immacolata in her home in Rome.
Immacolata, in great sorrow, has been praying for peace in Ukraine.
And she has a plan to help bring about that peace… through the grace of God, and the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary — a plan which I hope to be able to write more about in the coming days…
May it please God to bring her plans to fruition…
P.P.S. I plan now to visit Garabandal in northern Spain at the end of August. I plan to meet there with my fellow Irishman, Jeffrey Moynihan, the husband of Jacinta, one of the four young women the Virgin Mary appeared to in the early 1960s, 60 years ago now… It will be a “peace pilgrimage,” and will stop in include Lourdes in southern France, and in other holy shrines. If you might be interested in making a rather arduous, penitential journey at summer’s end, you may write to me by return email, or register your name at this link and we will send more information to you. —RM
***
Cardinal Zuppi visits Washington DC as part of peace mission for Ukraine
Cardinal Matteo Maria Zuppi travels to the US Capitol as Pope Francis’ special envoy to seek a peaceful solution to the ongoing war in Ukraine.
By Devin Watkins
The Holy See Press Office announced Monday that Italian Cardinal Matteo Zuppi is traveling to Washington, D.C. for a three-day visit as Pope Francis’ special envoy.
The Archbishop of Bologna and President of the Italian Bishops’ Conference is accompanied by an Official from the Vatican’s Secretariat of State.
The visit to the US Capitol takes place on 17-19 July, and comes on the heels of Cardinal Zuppi’s previous visits to Kyiv and Moscow.
‘Promote peace in Ukraine’
Pope Francis appointed the Italian Cardinal as his special envoy in early June, entrusting him with the mission of opening paths of dialogue and seeking peace in war-torn Ukraine.
The Holy See Press Office statement released on Monday said the purpose of Cardinal Zuppi’s visit to Washington is to “promote peace in Ukraine.”
“It seeks to facilitate the exchange of ideas and opinions regarding the current tragic situation, as well as to provide support for humanitarian initiatives aimed at alleviating the suffering of the most vulnerable people, particularly children,” read the statement.
Missions to Ukraine and Russia
Cardinal Zuppi visited the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv on 5-6 June, where he met with President Volodymyr Zelensky and several other high-level officials.
The Cardinal then traveled to Moscow on 28-30 June, where he met with Yuri Ushakov, Assistant to the President of the Russian Federation for Foreign Policy Affairs, and with Maria Lvova-Belova, Children’s Rights Commissioner for the President of the Russian Federation.
In Russia, Cardinal Zuppi met with Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia, conveyed Pope Francis’ greetings, and discussed humanitarian initiatives that could foster peace in Ukraine.
Peace mission on behalf of most vulnerable
Speaking after the visit to Moscow, Cardinal Zuppi said the priority is to work for those who are most disadvantaged.
“The children must be able to return to Ukraine,” he told reporters. “Thus, the next step will be first to check on the children and then to see how to get them back, starting with the most fragile ones.”
Upon returning from his missions to Kyiv and Moscow, Cardinal Zuppi met with Pope Francis to update him on the results of his peace mission in the Pope’s name.
***
P.S. Please consider supporting this writing. Thank you. (link)
The Real History of the War in Ukraine (link)
A Chronology of Events and Case for Diplomacy
July 17, 2023
By Jeffrey D. Sachs, Special to The Kennedy Beacon
The American people urgently need to know the true history of the war in Ukraine and its current prospects.
Unfortunately, the mainstream media ––The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, MSNBC, and CNN –– have become mere mouthpieces of the government, repeating US President Joe Biden’s lies and hiding history from the public.
Biden is again denigrating Russian President Vladimir Putin, this time accusing Putin of a “craven lust for land and power,” after declaring last year that “For God’s sake, that man [Putin] cannot stay in power.”
Yet Biden is the one who is trapping Ukraine in an open-ended war by continuing to push NATO enlargement to Ukraine. He is afraid to tell the truth to the American and Ukrainian people, rejecting diplomacy, and opting instead for perpetual war.
Expanding NATO to Ukraine, which Biden has long promoted, is a U.S. gambit that has failed. The neocons, including Biden, thought from the late 1990s onward that the US could expand NATO to Ukraine (and Georgia) despite Russia’s vociferous and long-standing opposition. They didn’t believe that Putin would actually go to war over NATO expansion.
Yet for Russia, NATO enlargement to Ukraine (and Georgia) is viewed as an existential threat to Russia’s national security, notably given Russia’s 2,000-km border with Ukraine, and Georgia’s strategic position on the eastern edge of the Black Sea. U.S. diplomats have explained this basic reality to U.S. politicians and generals for decades, but the politicians and generals have arrogantly and crudely persisted in pushing NATO enlargement nonetheless.
At this point, Biden knows full well that NATO enlargement to Ukraine would trigger World War III. That’s why behind the scenes Biden put NATO enlargement into low gear at the Vilnius NATO Summit. Yet rather than admit the truth – that Ukraine will not be part of NATO – Biden prevaricates, promising Ukraine’s eventual membership. In reality, he is committing Ukraine to ongoing bloodletting for no reason other than U.S. domestic politics, specifically Biden’s fear of looking weak to his political foes. (A half-century ago, Presidents Johnson and Nixon sustained the Vietnam War for essentially the same pathetic reason, and with the same lying, as the late Daniel Ellsberg brilliantly explained.)
Ukraine can’t win. Russia is more likely than not to prevail on the battlefield, as it seems now to be doing. Yet even if Ukraine were to break through with conventional forces and NATO weaponry, Russia would escalate to nuclear war if necessary to prevent NATO in Ukraine.
Throughout his entire career, Biden has served the military-industrial complex. He has relentlessly promoted NATO enlargement and supported America’s deeply destabilizing wars of choice in Afghanistan, Serbia, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and now Ukraine. He defers to generals who want more war and more “surges,” and who predict imminent victory just ahead to keep the gullible public onside.
Moreover, Biden and his team (Antony Blinken, Jake Sullivan, Victoria Nuland) seem to have believed their own propaganda that Western sanctions would strangle the Russian economy, while miracle weapons such as HIMARS would defeat Russia. And all the while, they have been telling Americans to pay no attention to Russia’s 6,000 nuclear weapons.
Ukrainian leaders have gone along with the US deception for reasons that are hard to fathom.
Perhaps they believe the US, or are afraid of the US, or fear their own extremists, or simply are extremists, ready to sacrifice hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians to death and injury in the naïve belief that Ukraine can defeat a nuclear superpower that regards the war as existential. Or possibly some of the Ukrainian leaders are making fortunes by skimming from the tens of billions of dollars of Western aid and arms.
The only way to save Ukraine is a negotiated peace. In a negotiated settlement, the US would agree that NATO will not enlarge to Ukraine while Russia would agree to withdraw its troops. Remaining issues – Crimea, the Donbas, US and European sanctions, the future of European security arrangements – would be handled politically, not by endless war.
Russia has repeatedly tried negotiations: to try to forestall the eastward enlargement of NATO; to try to find suitable security arrangements with the US and Europe; to try to settle inter-ethnic issues in Ukraine after 2014 (the Minsk I and Minsk II agreements); to try to sustain limits on anti-ballistic missiles; and to try to end the Ukraine war in 2022 via direct negotiations with Ukraine. In all cases, the US government disdained, ignored, or blocked these attempts, often putting forward the big lie that Russia rather than the US rejects negotiations. JFK said it exactly right in 1961: “Let us never negotiate out of fear, but let us never fear to negotiate.” If only Biden would heed JFK’s enduring wisdom.
To help the public move beyond the simplistic narrative of Biden and the mainstream media, I offer a brief chronology of some key events leading to the ongoing war.
January 31, 1990. German Foreign Minister Hans Dietrich-Genscher pledges to Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev that in the context of German reunification and disbanding of the Soviet Warsaw Pact military alliance, NATO will rule out an “expansion of its territory to the East, i.e., moving it closer to the Soviet borders.”
February 9, 1990. U.S. Secretary of State James Baker III agrees with Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev that “NATO expansion is unacceptable.”
June 29 – July 2, 1990. NATO Secretary-General Manfred Woerner tells a high-level Russian delegation that “the NATO Council and he [Woerner] are against the expansion of NATO.”
July 1, 1990. Ukrainian Rada (parliament) adopts the Declaration of State Sovereignty, in which “The Ukrainian SSR solemnly declares its intention of becoming a permanently neutral state that does not participate in military blocs and adheres to three nuclear free principles: to accept, to produce and to purchase no nuclear weapons.”
August 24, 1991. Ukraine declares independence on the basis of the 1990 Declaration of State Sovereignty, which includes the pledge of neutrality.
Mid-1992. Bush Administration policymakers reach a secret internal consensus to expand NATO, contrary to commitments recently made to the Soviet Union and the Russian Federation.
July 8, 1997. At the Madrid NATO Summit, Poland, Hungary, and Czech Republic are invited to begin NATO accession talks.
September-October, 1997. In Foreign Affairs (Sept/Oct, 1997) former U.S. National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski details the timeline for NATO enlargement, with Ukraine’s negotiations provisionally to begin during 2005-2010.
March 24 – June 10, 1999. NATO bombs Serbia. Russia terms the NATO bombing “a flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter.”
March 2000. Ukrainian President Kuchma declares that “there is no question of Ukraine joining NATO today since this issue is extremely complex and has many angles to it.”
June 13, 2002. The US unilaterally withdraws from the Anti-Ballistic Weapons Treaty, an action which the Vice-Chair of the Russian Duma Defense Committee characterizes as an “extremely negative event of historical scale.”
November-December 2004. The “Orange Revolution” occurs in Ukraine, events that the West characterizes as a democratic revolution and the Russian government characterizes as a Western-manufactured grab for power with overt and covert US support.
February 10, 2007. Putin strongly criticizes the U.S. attempt to create a unipolar world, backed by NATO enlargement, in a speech to the Munich Security Conference, declaring: “I think it is obvious that NATO expansion … represents a serious provocation that reduces the level of mutual trust. And we have the right to ask: against whom is this expansion intended? And what happened to the assurances our western partners made after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact?”
February 1, 2008. US Ambassador to Russia William Burns sends a confidential cable to U.S. National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, entitled “Nyet means Nyet: Russia’s NATO Enlargement Redlines,” emphasizing that “Ukraine and Georgia’s NATO aspirations not only touch a raw nerve in Russia, they engender serious concerns about the consequences for stability in the region.”
February 18, 2008. The US recognizes Kosovo independence over heated Russian objections. The Russian Government declares that Kosovo independence violates “the sovereignty of the Republic of Serbia, the Charter of the United Nations, UNSCR 1244, the principles of the Helsinki Final Act, Kosovo’s Constitutional Framework and the high-level Contact Group accords.”
April 3, 2008. NATO declares that Ukraine and Georgia “will become members of NATO.” Russia declares that “Georgia’s and Ukraine’s membership in the alliance is a huge strategic mistake which would have most serious consequences for pan-European security.”
August 20, 2008. The US announces that it will deploy ballistic missile defense (BMD) systems in Poland, to be followed later by Romania. Russia expresses strenuous opposition to the BMD systems.
January 28, 2014. Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and US Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt plot regime change in Ukraine in a call that is intercepted and posted on YouTube on February 7, in which Nuland notes that “[Vice President] Biden’s willing” to help close the deal.
February 21, 2014. Governments of Ukraine, Poland, France, and Germany reach an Agreement on settlement of political crisis in Ukraine, calling for new elections later in the year. The far-right Right Sector and other armed groups instead demand Yanukovych’s immediate resignation, and take over government buildings. Yanukovych flees. The Parliament immediately strips the President of his powers without an impeachment process.
February 22, 2014. The US immediately endorses the regime change.
March 16, 2014. Russia holds a referendum in Crimea that according to the Russian Government results in a large majority vote for Russian rule. On March 21, the Russian Duma votes to admit Crimea to the Russian Federation. The Russian Government draws the analogy to the Kosovo referendum. The US rejects the Crimea referendum as illegitimate.
March 18, 2014. President Putin characterizes the regime change as a coup, stating: “those who stood behind the latest events in Ukraine had a different agenda: they were preparing yet another government takeover; they wanted to seize power and would stop short of nothing. They resorted to terror, murder and riots.”
March 25, 2014. President Barack Obama mocks Russia “as a regional power that is threatening some of its immediate neighbors — not out of strength but out of weakness,”
February 12, 2015. Signing of Minsk II agreement. The agreement is unanimously backed by the UN Security Council Resolution 2202 on February 17, 2015. Former Chancellor Angela Merkel later acknowledges that the Minsk II agreement was designed to give time for Ukraine to strengthen its military. It was not implemented by Ukraine, and President Volodymyr Zelensky acknowledged that he had no intention to implement the agreement.
February 1, 2019. The U.S. unilaterally withdraws from the Intermediate Nuclear Force (INF) Treaty. Russia harshly criticizes the INF withdrawal as a “destructive” act that stoked security risks.
June 14, 2021. At the 2021 NATO Summit in Brussels, NATO reconfirms NATO’s intention to enlarge and include Ukraine: “We reiterate the decision made at the 2008 Bucharest Summit that Ukraine will become a member of the Alliance.”
September 1, 2021. The US reiterates support for Ukraine’s NATO aspirations in the “Joint Statement on the U.S.-Ukraine Strategic Partnership.”
December 17, 2021. Putin puts forward a draft “Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Security Guarantees,” based on non-enlargement of NATO and limitations on the deployment of intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles.
January 26, 2022. The U.S. formally replies to Russia that the US and NATO will not negotiate with Russia over issues of NATO enlargement, slamming the door on a negotiated path to avoid an expansion of the war in Ukraine. The U.S. invokes NATO policy that “Any decision to invite a country to join the Alliance is taken by the North Atlantic Council on the basis of consensus among all Allies. No third country has a say in such deliberations.” In short, the US asserts that NATO enlargement to Ukraine is none of Russia’s business.
February 21, 2022. At a meeting of the Russian Security Council, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov details the U.S. refusal to negotiate:
“We received their response in late January. The assessment of this response shows that our Western colleagues are not prepared to take up our major proposals, primarily those on NATO’s eastward non-expansion. This demand was rejected with reference to the bloc’s so-called open-door policy and the freedom of each state to choose its own way of ensuring security. Neither the United States, nor the North Atlantic Alliance proposed an alternative to this key provision.”
The United States is doing everything it can to avoid the principle of indivisibility of security that we consider of fundamental importance and to which we have made many references. Deriving from it the only element that suits them – the freedom to choose alliances – they completely ignore everything else, including the key condition that reads that nobody – either in choosing alliances or regardless of them – is allowed to enhance their security at the expense of the security of others.”
February 24, 2022. In an address to the nation, President Putin declares: “It is a fact that over the past 30 years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement with the leading NATO countries regarding the principles of equal and indivisible security in Europe. In response to our proposals, we invariably faced either cynical deception and lies or attempts at pressure and blackmail, while the North Atlantic alliance continued to expand despite our protests and concerns. Its military machine is moving and, as I said, is approaching our very border.”
March 16, 2022. Russia and Ukraine announce significant progress towards a peace agreement mediated by Turkey and Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett. As reported in the press, the basis of the agreement includes: “a ceasefire and Russian withdrawal if Kyiv declares neutrality and accepts limits on its armed forces.”
March 28, 2022. President Zelensky publicly declares that Ukraine is ready for neutrality combined with security guarantees as part of a peace agreement with Russia. “Security guarantees and neutrality, the non-nuclear status of our state — we’re ready to do that. That’s the most important point … they started the war because of it.”
April 7, 2022. Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov accuses the West of trying to derail the peace talks, claiming that Ukraine had gone back on previously agreed proposals. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett later states (on February 5, 2023) that the U.S. had blocked the pending Russia-Ukraine peace agreement. When asked if the Western powers blocked the agreement, Bennett answered: “Basically, yes. They blocked it, and I thought they were wrong.” At some point, says Bennett, the West decided “to crush Putin rather than to negotiate.”
June 4, 2023. Ukraine launches a major counter-offensive, without achieving any major success as of mid-July 2023.
July 7, 2023. Biden acknowledges that Ukraine is “running out” of 155mm artillery shells, and that the US is “running low.”
July 11, 2023. At the NATO Summit in Vilnius, the final communique reaffirms Ukraine’s future in NATO: “We fully support Ukraine’s right to choose its own security arrangements. Ukraine’s future is in NATO … Ukraine has become increasingly interoperable and politically integrated with the Alliance, and has made substantial progress on its reform path.”
July 13, 2023. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin reiterates that Ukraine will “no doubt” join NATO when the war ends.
July 13, 2023. Putin reiterates that “As for Ukraine’s NATO membership, as we have said many times, this obviously creates a threat to Russia’s security. In fact, the threat of Ukraine’s accession to NATO is the reason, or rather one of the reasons for the special military operation. I am certain that this would not enhance Ukraine’s security in any way either. In general, it will make the world much more vulnerable and lead to more tensions in the international arena. So, I don’t see anything good in this. Our position is well known and has long been formulated.”
[End Sachs’ July 17 article]
Facebook Comments